The incredible invasion — A Reader’s Guide

(0 User reviews)   1367
In Category - Machines Invention
Smith, George O. (George Oliver), 1911-1981, Ayers, Dick, 1924-2014 [Illustrator] Project Gutenberg 2022 Not confirmed
Science fiction; Short stories; Diseases -- Fiction; Epidemics -- Fiction; Dictators -- Fiction; United Nations -- Fiction Readers of public-domain and historical texts
Project Gutenberg digital edition en

Edition facts

Words 9,403
Reading time 41 min
Text sections 1

The catalog record for The incredible invasion — A Reader’s Guide provides practical reading context through 9,403 words, 41 min estimated reading time, and 1 detected text section.

The text analysis averages about 16.0 words per sentence, while the detected sections provide another way to judge how the source is divided.

Project Gutenberg metadata also associates the work with “Science fiction,” connecting these edition facts with the source record’s subject description.

In this 1948 novella, UN weapons inspector Jim Franklen suspects a Central European dictator is using engineered plagues for territorial expansion, but the story's evidence of biological warfare remains circumstantial, hinging on diplomatic letters and epidemiological patterns rather than scientific proof.
Share
Editorial Edition Score 4.4/5

Calculated from edition completeness, EPUB availability, text structure and catalogue metadata. Not a user rating.

How this score is calculated
  • Description quality20 pts
  • Title & short description10 pts
  • Source metadata20 pts
  • Text length15 pts
  • Chapters / structure15 pts
  • EPUB file integrity20 pts

Total of 100 points, scaled to a 2.5-5.0 range. Editions with an empty description or a missing EPUB file are not scored.

Edition quality

Read the Text

Franklen looked at the big flag on the back wall of the office. "The United Nations," he said bitterly. "With one member slightly disunited." He turned back to the president of the Weapon Council. "Have they, by any chance, made secret pacts with other nations?"

"Not that we can tell," said Winter. "Now don't say that this is negative evidence and therefore inconclusive. It is admittedly negative evidence, but so definitely negative that it is conclusive. The Central Power has been told that if they make a move, they'll be counter-attacked within the hour."

Franklen paused in his walking and said: "Look, sir, there's one thing about the atomic weapon that is seldom considered. I've been thinking about this for a long time. Frankly, the atomic weapon is a fine instrument for any country to use--providing it has no intention of invading for territorial aggrandization."

"Cities are where they are because it is economically sound that they should be there. New York is the largest city in North America only because it is situated on the one spot where most goods funnel out of the country. It grew because of that fact--the fact did not follow the city's growth. In all the world, perhaps Washington, D. C., is the only city that is where it is because someone said 'we shall place our city here!' and Washington could function very well if it were lifted in toto and dropped on the center of Ohio, providing it landed on some big railroad junction. Boston is a second rate city despite all the efforts of the city planners only because its harbor is less efficient than New York's harbor and because Boston is not handily located geographically for the rest of the country. Even though Boston is closer to Europe than New York, it is cheaper to ship the goods a little farther by water, for they've got to be transshipped anyway, somewhere. For inland cities, both Detroit and Chicago are great because of their location; if their locations were not good, Chicago might still be a little tank town called Fort Dearborn, situated on the South Bank of the Chicago River--which would still be emptying into Lake Michigan."

"Granted, but what are you getting at?" asked Winter.

"Mankind has dropped two bombs in anger so far," said Franklen. "Both were dropped at the close of a war, to end it. Japan was not invaded for aggrandization. Therefore, no Americans were required to enter Hiroshima and try to rebuild it. We don't care too much whether Nagasaki ever gets rebuilt, though it will, eventually, because of the necessity of having a city right there."

"The next time we have atomic trouble," said Franklen, "it'll not be exploded high in the air. It's more likely to emerge right out of the walls of one of those buildings. That will mean radioactivity in the area that will render it dangerous to life for some time. In any case, a totally destroyed New York is not an economic asset."

"And the Central Power knows that we will not use the atomic weapons until they are used in aggression."

"No, you're wrong," said Winter. "We have promised them--and everybody--that at the first outbreak of hostility, the United Nations Weapon Council will see to it that one of their cities is reduced each day until the aggression ceases and reparations are made." He banged a hand into his fist. "It's a harsh promise, my boy, but it must be. For a border fist fight leads to knives, and knives lead to revolvers, and they lead to rifles, which lead to artillery. The next step in the scene is the works, complete and whole."

Franklen shook his head. "The first step is words," he said positively. "Then come the fists. We should let 'em have a sample on the first angry words."

"Can't. It's entirely possible that a party can be so nasty and quiet that steps are necessary on the part of the other. The truth must be investigated."

"Is that what's been happening?" asked Jim Franklen.

"At first it looked so," said Winter. "They started by upping tariffs and getting too rigorous with people coming in. They were told, and they replied that their country was at present overcrowded. Why, Jim, the entire pattern is familiar. They've been holding elections and all the trimmings for years, now, and every election they hold brings more territory into their hands."

"That's something that can't be easily judged," admitted Franklen grudgingly.

The story opens not with an invasion but with a bureaucratic exchange: Jim Franklen reads the lettering on a United Nations Weapon Security Council door before entering to discuss a geopolitical standoff. The dialogue between Franklen and President Winter establishes a world where atomic weapons have created a stalemate, yet the Central Power grows bolder. Winter's description of surveillance—so many agents watching that 'even the janitors must find UN Representatives looking up out of their coffee cups'—grounds the tension in mundane detail rather than action.

The excerpts offer no invasion scenes. Instead, the 'incredible invasion' is inferred through Franklen's hypothesis that Hohmann uses biological warfare, a theory supported by a letter from Hohmann himself and the pattern of plagues striking France and Mexico. The catalog subjects list 'Diseases -- Fiction' and 'Epidemics -- Fiction,' but the text treats illness as a political tool, not a natural disaster.

Dialogue as Evidence

The narrative relies almost entirely on conversation. Franklen and Winter discuss the Central Power's actions through reported intelligence and logical deduction. Winter's line—'I can't imagine what they're up to. Yet they continue to rattle the saber and make demands'—captures the uncertainty that drives the plot. When Franklen proposes biological warfare, his reasoning is presented as a sudden insight: 'I've got it!' The proof he promises to find never appears in the excerpts; instead, the story ends with Franklen reading a teletyped page from Sonora, Mexico, suggesting another outbreak. The reader, like Franklen, must weigh circumstantial evidence.

The Letter as a Narrative Device

A key piece of evidence is a letter from Edvard Hohmann, Commissario of the Central Power, inviting Franklen to a meeting with the French Chamber of Deputies. The letter's tone is conciliatory—'a meeting of minds is always possible between men of high purpose'—but Franklen finds it suspicious. The letter serves as the story's only direct communication from the antagonist, yet it reveals no explicit plot. Hohmann's claim that both sides must 'part with certain factors' hints at concessions without specifying what is surrendered. The excerpts do not show Franklen's response or the meeting's outcome, leaving the letter's significance ambiguous.

The Absent Invasion

Despite the title, the excerpts contain no description of an invasion. The closest the text comes to conflict is the aftermath of plagues in France and Mexico, where American aid is sent and 'American wealth was poured in.' Franklen's theory that Hohmann's troops are 'vicious carriers' who spread illness while appearing to help is presented as speculation, not confirmed fact. The catalog subject 'Dictators -- Fiction' fits Hohmann's role, but the story's focus is on the difficulty of proving covert biological warfare, not on the dictator's actions. The reader is left with Franklen's weary question: 'Warfare—or happenstance?'

The excerpts end before any resolution, with Franklen reading a teletype from Sonora. Readers should attend to how the story builds its case through inference rather than spectacle. The novella's structure—a series of conversations and documents—mirrors the investigative process itself. Pay attention to what is not shown: the invasion, the proof, the dictator's confession. The work rewards a focus on its rhetorical strategies over its plot mechanics.

The rain kept the afternoon slow, and I returned often to the circumstantial dread in The Incredible Invasion, how suspicion never quite becomes proof. That unsettled feeling stayed with me afterward. Later, almost by accident, I reached for another book that lingers on the same shadowed spaces between evidence and fear, The Invisible Enemy — A Closer Reading, and found the quiet there matched the weather outside.

There are no reviews for this eBook.

0
0 out of 5 (0 User reviews )

Add a Review

Your Rating *
There are no comments for this eBook.

Reader reflection

Record your reading impressions

A brief reflection can help important ideas stay with you longer.

Your progress 0 / 10
1

Have you finished this book?

2

Was reading this book enjoyable?

3

How likely are you to recommend this book?

4

How demanding did the text feel?

Related eBooks